Know who is actually coming for you
Most guides describe how things work and leave you to guess where the danger is. This one starts from the other end. Fourteen adversaries, each with a page: what they want, how they make money, how they operate, what gives them away, and what stops them. Nothing here is theoretical. Every one of them is running right now, against people who read the same guides you did.
Four things worth knowing before the list
Almost nobody is caught by anything sophisticated. The common attacks are common because they cost the attacker nothing.
Nothing here legitimately needs you to act inside a stated period. A clock is not a schedule.
A familiar address, a familiar layout and a fast response are all things a copy reproduces perfectly.
A signature verified against a fingerprint you established yourself defeats or badly weakens almost every profile in this register.
How almost every one of them actually runs
The names differ and the shape barely does. Once you have seen the four steps, most of the register becomes recognisable on sight rather than something you have to memorise.
Reach you somewhere ordinary
A search result, a directory, a forum thread, a saved bookmark. Nothing exotic, because exotic is expensive and unnecessary. The channel just has to look like where you would normally look.
Look exactly right
The page is copied, the address opens on the recognisable characters, the interface matches your memory. Every heuristic short of a signature returns a positive.
Give you a reason to hurry
A deadline, an outage, a warning, a problem with your account. Urgency is the only thing that reliably stops people checking, so it is present in nearly every one of these.
Take one action from you
A password typed, an address pasted, a payment sent outside escrow. One action, once, and the rest follows without you.
Who is after you
Sorted roughly by how many people they reach. The first four account for most of what actually happens to ordinary buyers.
What stops them
Six habits. Between them they cover every adversary above, which is the useful part: you are not learning fourteen defences, you are learning six.
What this site is
A register, not a link list
The three addresses at the top of every page are published, not monitored. This site checks nothing and states no uptime figure, because a number it cannot back is worse than no number at all. Treat them as a starting point and do the verification yourself.
- No status badges. A green light means a machine answered, and a convincing fake answers faster than the real thing.
- No freshness claims. Nothing here says checked today, because nobody checked today.
- No exclusivity. Nothing on this page is available only here.
Paid by nobody
No advertising, no affiliate arrangement, no money from any market. Worth stating plainly, because the standard business model for a site covering this ground is to be paid by the thing it covers, and readers have no way to tell from outside which sites are.
- Products or sourcing. Not a gap to be filled later.
- Packaging or avoiding detection. Outside what this site is for.
- Anything about running these attacks. The method is described to the depth needed to recognise it and no further.
If you read one page, read this one
Every adversary in the register is stopped or badly weakened by the same check, run on arrival, taking under a minute. It is the closest thing to a single answer this subject has.
The check that settles itQuestions people ask
Which of the three addresses is the real one?
All three are published addresses for the same market, and none of them prove anything by appearing here. That is the point of checking on arrival rather than trusting a list.
Is this site telling me BlackOps is unsafe?
No. It is describing the people who operate around any market of this kind, most of whom have nothing to do with the platform itself. Several of them would be running whether the market existed or not.
Why no uptime percentage?
Because this site measures nothing and will not print a figure it cannot back. Sites that publish one rarely say what it measures, and the answer is almost always reachability, which a fake passes easily.